• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Alston Asquith

Leading Technology & Commercial Law Firm

  • Home
  • Services
    • Commercial
    • Commercial Property
    • Construction
    • Corporate
    • Data Protection
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment
    • Insolvency
    • Intellectual Property
    • Tax
    • Technology
  • People
  • News
  • Insights
    • Commercial Law
      • Shareholders Agreements
      • What is a Partnership Agreement?
      • What is a promissory note?
    • Corporate Law
      • What is an Asset Purchase Agreement?
      • What is a Share Purchase Agreement?
    • Dispute Resolution
      • Estoppel: a guide on the facts and uses
      • Unmasking the anonymous with Norwich Pharmacal orders
      • The Law of Tracing
    • Injunctions
      • Springboard Injunctions
      • Freezing injunctions: a practical guide
      • Injunctions
    • Insolvency
      • How to issue a winding up petition
      • What is a statutory demand?
  • About Us
  • Join Us
    • Join Us
    • Careers
  • Contact Us
    • London Office
    • Hertfordshire Office
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Qualcomm could owe 4G smartphone owners £480m in price inflation lawsuit

Thursday, 25 February 2021, 13:31 By Alston Asquith

Nearly 30 million owners of a 4G smartphone could find themselves with a refund of up to £30 each if consumer rights lobbyist and watchdog Which? is successful with their legal action against manufacturer Qualcomm for inflating prices through their market domination.

Which? claims that the price inflations amounts to anti-competitive abuse and has brought its complaint before the Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) as it believes that Qualcomm leveraged their dominance in the market to artificially inflate the prices it can charge manufacturers which are ultimately passed onto 4G smartphone owners. CAT will decide if the claim can indeed go ahead.

4G smartphone manufacturers such as Apple and Samsung are licensed to reproduce the technology that Qualcomm has patented. The phones in question were produced from October 2015 onwards and estimate the total number of devices at around 29 million. Each phone could earn the owners up to £30 each but Which? estimates the majority of phone owners will be entitled to £17.

This is not the first time that Qualcomm has faced this type of action. They were able to successfully fend off the Federal Trade Commission in 2017 within the US court system after it was claimed they were using unfair practices.

Qualcomm has said the claims have “no basis” and will likely use a similar argument as they did previously stating “As the plaintiffs are well aware, their claims were effectively put to rest last summer by a unanimous panel of judges at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the United States.”

In 2018 they were however fined just short of €1bn by the European Commission and another €242m in 2019 for a similar case involving 3G chips which Qualcomm is attempting to appeal.

The chief executive of Which? Anabel Hoult said: “We are sending a clear warning that if companies like Qualcomm indulge in manipulative practices which harm consumers, Which? is prepared to take action.”

If you’ve bought an Apple or Samsung phone since 1/10/15, you could be owed money. Which? is taking legal action on behalf of 29 million UK consumers against US tech giant Qualcomm. To find out if you’ve overpaid & register visit https://t.co/BEaGweqdjm #SmartphoneClaim

— Which? (@WhichUK) February 25, 2021

Which? hopes to settle with Qualcomm but will use the Consumer Rights Act 2015 to their benefit if they need to, meaning they can bring the collective action on an opt-out basis. This allows them to make a collective claim on behalf of the 4G smartphone owners and as long as they haven’t opted-out they are automatically entitled to the refund without having to be identified.

Which? has stated that it believes Qualcomm to be in breach of competition law for refusing to license patents to competitors and refusing to supply chipsets to 4G smartphone manufacturers unless they obtain a separate license and pay the inflated royalties.

4G smartphone owners can check if they have one of the affected models and register by visiting a website set up by the watchdog. Not only do they hope to win compensation but they hope this action will deter companies from similar behaviour in the future.

Do you have a technology matter that you’d like to discuss with the team? Alston Asquith has offices in London and Hertfordshire and can arrange a call to provide some initial advice.

We pride ourselves on our relationship with our clients as well as the service we provide. View some of our feedback on Trustpilot.

Visit our contact page to find out how we can help.

4G smartphone owners from Apple and Samsung could be owed £480m from Qualcomm

Filed Under: Tech News

Primary Sidebar

Latest Legal News

Legal Foundations

Embracing Innovation – Our New Collaboration with Legal Foundations

Saturday, 10 February 2024, 21:16 By Alston Asquith

First reported successful judgement on COVID-19 commercial rent claim for a premises in Westfield Shopping Centre, West London

First reported successful judgement on COVID-19 commercial rent claim

Wednesday, 21 April 2021, 15:34 By Alston Asquith

European Super League set for mammoth legal dispute with UEFA

European Super League set for mammoth legal dispute with UEFA

Tuesday, 20 April 2021, 16:57 By Alston Asquith

Follow Alston Asquith

  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter
Tower 42
25 Old Broad Street
London
EC2N 1HN
Get Directions
+44 (0)20 3950 3538
info@alstonasquith.com

Alston Asquith Limited Copyright © 2025

  • Navigation
  • Home
  • Services
  • People
  • News
  • Insights
    Legal and Regulatory
  • Accessibility
  • Legal Notices
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Engagement
  • Modern Slavery Act
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • About Us
  • Contact Us